What brings it back

• Conference Strength Index

  Output appeared implausible in audit; method unproven.

  • Named source data
  • Computation rules published on /methodology
  • Sanity checks against final-season results
  • Direct vs. derived values labeled wherever shown

• Strength of Schedule

  Computation rules and source poll/data provider undocumented.

  • Named source for opponent data
  • Computation rules published on /methodology
  • Direct vs. derived values labeled wherever shown
  • Sanity checks against known-good seasons

• wOBA

  Linear weights not validated against college run environments.

  • Named source data feed
  • Exact formula published on /methodology
  • College-level (not MLB) constants and level-of-play fit
  • Minimum sample size stated wherever the number renders
  • Update cadence shown from real metadata, not copy
  • Plain-English glossary entry linked next to every appearance